<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. States Budget Gap Heat Map</title>
	<atom:link href="http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:44:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Walker</title>
		<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>Yes. The labels completely clutter the map. They should be in a legend or chart table.

IMO, this type of heat maps are good for showing relationships, especially within large sets of geo-coded data. I&#039;ve used them succesfully to point out the opportunities and indentifying outliers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. The labels completely clutter the map. They should be in a legend or chart table.</p>
<p>IMO, this type of heat maps are good for showing relationships, especially within large sets of geo-coded data. I&#8217;ve used them succesfully to point out the opportunities and indentifying outliers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>If the map is tweaked into a cartogram, and scaled to population, then you get a better perspective. See Mark Newman&#039;s examples:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the map is tweaked into a cartogram, and scaled to population, then you get a better perspective. See Mark Newman&#8217;s examples:</p>
<p><a href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>@Liu - I agree.  The black obscures a lot of the state and especially the small states.   The legend shouldn&#039;t cover up any of the map (Washington State).  I also like the notion that there could be a good story in the white states and their apparent surplus.  

@Robert - In the case of the election and data being mapped, I did see an interesting take on the Northeast (smaller) states.  On the right side of the map there were boxes for each state with the abbreviation and color.  It did make it easier to see. 

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/

I think a map is good for a quick glance, but not any real meaningful analysis.  

A small map with a sorted list may be the best bet.

Here are a few good ones that serve their purpose:

http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Liu &#8211; I agree.  The black obscures a lot of the state and especially the small states.   The legend shouldn&#8217;t cover up any of the map (Washington State).  I also like the notion that there could be a good story in the white states and their apparent surplus.  </p>
<p>@Robert &#8211; In the case of the election and data being mapped, I did see an interesting take on the Northeast (smaller) states.  On the right side of the map there were boxes for each state with the abbreviation and color.  It did make it easier to see. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/</a></p>
<p>I think a map is good for a quick glance, but not any real meaningful analysis.  </p>
<p>A small map with a sorted list may be the best bet.</p>
<p>Here are a few good ones that serve their purpose:</p>
<p><a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html" rel="nofollow">http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kosara</title>
		<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kosara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>Maps are generally a bad choice for showing data IMHO, you can see the problems quite nicely here. The boxes pile up in the northeast and it&#039;s hard to see which states there have a gap and which don&#039;t. For some states like Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the boxes cover the state almost entirely. What is represented is also budget gaps per area, rather than per population, which is much more interesting.

I agree about a sorted list, perhaps with a small map to point to for the most interesting ones. But as it is, this is a very poor representation of the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maps are generally a bad choice for showing data IMHO, you can see the problems quite nicely here. The boxes pile up in the northeast and it&#8217;s hard to see which states there have a gap and which don&#8217;t. For some states like Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the boxes cover the state almost entirely. What is represented is also budget gaps per area, rather than per population, which is much more interesting.</p>
<p>I agree about a sorted list, perhaps with a small map to point to for the most interesting ones. But as it is, this is a very poor representation of the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liu's chart blog</title>
		<link>http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Liu's chart blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://supportanalytics.com/blog/2008/11/us-states-budget-gap-heat-map-3/#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Of course ,I agree with you ,he shouldnt add the data labels, especialy, the title area of the labels shouldnt be filled black.
and ,how about the &quot;white&quot; states ?may they have surplus ，but readers want to know also!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course ,I agree with you ,he shouldnt add the data labels, especialy, the title area of the labels shouldnt be filled black.<br />
and ,how about the &#8220;white&#8221; states ?may they have surplus ，but readers want to know also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

